Unlock the publisher’s digest free
Roula Khalaf, editor -in -chief of the FT, selects her favorite stories in this weekly newsletter.
A drop in loan costs gave the Chancellor in the United Kingdom Rachel Reeves a greater place for the maneuver while trying to respect her close tax rules, but public finances remain exposed to the economic deterioration of deterioration of the country, warn analysts.
British government obligations have erased most of their losses since the October budget of Reeves, which reports long -term loan costs near the level they maintained before its tax and expenditure plans accelerate a golden market sale.
Golden yields at ten years old, which conversely switch to Price, dropped up to 4.44% on Friday, in less than 4.93% last month and near the 4.32% pre-bunda level.
But dark forecasts this week from the Bank of England, which has halved its growth estimate in 2025, suggest that the government will find it difficult to bring borrowing quickly in the years to come.
This “simply shows how fast the music of the atmosphere changes,” said Nick Hayes, responsible for fixed income holders at Axa Investment Managers. “Not long ago, the licks were in a” buckle of destiny “. . . And the yields went around 5% ”.
The resurgence of the nicknames is due to a combination of a global bond rally and the prospect of faster interest rate reductions by the BOE, which announced Thursday a reduction of a quarter of a point, in a sign of the economic growth and the softening of inflation.
The market decision has brought a relief to reeves while trying to respect its self-imposed budgetary rule that daily expenses are covered by tax receipts.
The Office of Budget Liability, the United Kingdom’s tax guard dog, said in October that the Chancellor had 9.9 billion pounds sterling of head margin – the replacement margin that she has against her tax meeting.
The subsequent increase in golden yields had led economists to warn that such a room for maneuver – the third lower since 2010 – had been destroyed by higher loan costs.
Andrew Goodwin at Oxford Economics believes that because of the golden market rally, Reeves now has about 5 billion pounds sterling in the tax room, the level of half of October, but better than the negative position in the Depths of the January sale.
However, he warned that the additional reeves scope won “pale compared to what could happen if [the OBR] modifies its growth or profits forecasts ”.
He added: “It was a very big risk of leaving so little margin to start, and this risk potentially crystallized.”
Many fund managers have a similar analysis and argue that new expense reductions or tax increases will be necessary to strengthen the Budget position of the United Kingdom.
Economists say that if OBR defines economic forecasts of slowdown similar to this week’s BOE estimates, this would add to pressure on public finances, due to the greatest growth in tax revenue.
The BOE now expects GDP to increase only 0.75% this year before resuming in 2026 and 2027, while unemployment could reach 4.75%.
It has also become more pessimistic about the pace to which the British economy can grow without increasing inflation.
In its annual stocking of the economy’s supply, the central bank said that the UK potential growth rate – often described as a “speed limit” to sustainable GDP growth – has slowed down to Only 0.75% by the beginning of 2025, down by 1.5% a year earlier.
The BOE said it expected potential growth to increase in the following years, leaving its forecasts to 1.5%.
Huw Pill, Boe chief economist, said on Friday that the bank was “not in a situation where we can declare the work done” with regard to inflation, because he insisted that they do not would not rush to lower rates.
“It is still necessary to maintain a restriction in the position of monetary policy,” he said, adding that the growth in higher than expected remuneration was a reason for caution with regard to additional reductions in rates .
Some economists have predicted that OBR could possibly be forced to reduce its potential growth forecasts given the constantly disappointing performance of British productivity in recent years.
This would take a blow for public finances, because OBR forecasts are the basis of government’s budgetary plans.
A reduction in potential growth forecasts would have “very important impacts on the margin of the head of Rachel Reeves,” Rob Wood told the Macroeconomics of the Pantheon.
The chancellor “desperately hopes” that the OBR does not decide to make such demotion, he added.
