Public frustration in the United Kingdom develops Prince Harry And Meghan MarkleThe continuous use of royal securities and security requests funded by taxpayers.
According to a new survey, most British seem to want Harry to have his title, citing his departure from royal duties and repeated criticism from the monarchy.
Meghan Markle was also confronted with reactions for having used his title of HRH in private, although the initiates claim that no rule has been infringement.
The article continues below the advertising
The calls to strip Prince Harry and Meghan Markle of their titles are intensifying: “enough it is enough”
Frustration rises among the British audience, calling Harry and Meghan to be stripped of their royal titles, with a premises declaring: “Quite fairly”.
Speaking to New York Post,, A frustrated British individual expressed his dissatisfaction, wondering why the public should pay for security for Harry, Meghan and their children: “Why devil, the British public, should we pay the bill for this?”
They added: “He chose to leave. Simple as. I want security? Should have stayed.”
A recent investigation by the Express Also revealed that 97% of the 4,500 respondents thought that King Charles should revoke the royal title of Harry.
This feeling was taken up by a previous survey of Discover nowwhich highlighted a sharp drop in support for the Sussex in the United Kingdom.
The article continues below the advertising
However, public feeling has not dissuaded Meghan from occasionally using his HRH title in a private environment.
The article continues below the advertising
Meghan Markle used his HRH title to send a gift to a friend
Last month, the Duchess of Sussex was revealed to have used her title on a personal note attached to a gift basket shared by her friend Jamie Kern Lima.
The lively eyes observers noticed a note that said: “With compliments from HRH the Duchess of Sussex”, which had been sent about a year ago.
Meanwhile, sources close to Meghan said that the use of the HRH title was in a private and personal context and not intended for public exhibition.
They denied any violation of the agreement of the Sussexes with the late Queen Elizabeth II, saying that neither Harry nor Meghan use their HRH titles in commercial or public contexts.
The article continues below the advertising
The use by Meghan Markle of the HRH title has triggered a backlash
The incident with the title of HRH of Meghan quickly made waves in Great Britain, with a royal initiate revealing the New York Post that the case was even discussed behind closed doors in the palace.
A former supporter of Harry and Meghan expressed his disappointment, saying that the couple did everything possible to embarrass the monarchy, especially during such a delicate period for Charles, who fights against cancer.
He described their actions as “despicable”, referring to their many high -level lucrative projects such as Harry’s controversial Memoir, “Rabking”, their Netflix series “Harry & Meghan” and the explosive interview with Oprah Winfrey 2021.
“These are constant attacks without any real consequences,” he added. “THE [late] The queen would be horrified. “”
The article continues below the advertising
Prince Harry stimulates indignation with the BBC interview after losing a legal battle for his British security
Harry sparked new controversy last week after addressing his tied ties with the royal family during a Bbc Interview only a few hours after losing its legal fight to receive security funded by the public in the United Kingdom.
The Duke of Sussex expressed a deep disappointment in the face of the court’s decision, describing the result as the result of a “good old -fashioned establishment”.
He referred to a disturbing conspiracy theory, suggesting that certain influential personalities may want him and his family to suffer a fate similar to that of his mother, Princess Diana, who died tragically in a Paris car accident in 1997.
Harry did not hold back during the interview, criticizing Charles for having cut the communication. He also thought about his father’s cancer battle, saying: “Life is precious. I don’t know how long my father has time; he won’t talk to me because of these security things. It would be good to be reconciled.”
The article continues below the advertising
Royal commentators slam the interview with Prince Harry’s BBC as “disturbing” and “precipitate”
During a recent episode of “Confidential Palace”, royal commentators dissected Harry’s explosive Bbc Interview, several expressing their concern about their tone and claims.
THEEvery day Email‘s The editor -in -chief Royal, Rebecca English, described the interview as “monumental whistle”, stressing how Harry suggested that Harry suggested that there were individuals who wish him harm and could consider his loss of security as a personal victory.
“Some aspects are really very disturbing,” she said. “Where Harry goes from here, I don’t know.”
Other royal experts, Charlotte Griffiths and Richard Eden, echoed similar feelings, with the host Jo Elvin noting that Harry appeared as “Beyond Furious”, argued that Eden argued.
“I will have to pay attention to the way I phrase that, but I thought he did not seem well in his expression, his behavior,” continued Eden.
He also hypothesized that the interview seemed to be rushed, saying, “Often, if you are angry with something, people say that you should sleep on it, but it seemed to be something, and I think the BBC would confirm that it was done in a hurry.”
