Doordash is ask the court to fire The trial submitted by Uber in February, the appellant "Tactic of cynical and calculated fear." Uber continued the largest food delivery supplier in the United States earlier this year, accusing it of putting pressure on restaurants to use its services exclusively. At the time, Uber said he had heard "restaurants across the country" This Doordash was billing higher rates of restaurants that also sell their food on Uber Eats. He also accused Doordash of threatening to demote restaurants in his ads if they are also available on the Uber Eats application. But in his request in dismissal, Doordash said that Uber’s trial did not aim to protect the competition but to avoid it.
The food delivery provider said Uber "could not offer merchants, consumers and mails high quality services" that it provides, therefore uber "has resorted to asserting baseless legal complaints" Instead of competing with your own merits. He wrote in his request that Uber’s complaint is "rooted in the erroneous notion" That he must change his business practices, which, she said, is pro-competitive, to give way to Uber’s affairs. However, the company explained that the law is "Concerned about the protection of competition, not competitors."
Meanwhile, Uber said Techcrunch This doordash was "have trouble understanding" His complaint. "When restaurants are forced to choose between unjust terms or reprisals, it is not competition – it is coercion," His spokesperson said. The Superior Court of the County of San Francisco, California, should hear Uber’s trial on July 11.
This article originally appeared on engadget to
