Unlock the publisher’s digest free
Roula Khalaf, editor -in -chief of the FT, selects her favorite stories in this weekly newsletter.
According to research, only 1% of those in the workforce for health reasons find a job in the six months, even if 20% wish one, according to research which underlines the challenge that the government is confronted for Reduce the bill on a spiral well-being of the United Kingdom.
The Learning and Work Institute declared its conclusions, Posted Tuesday, has shown the need to modify financial incentives for sick and disabled people to work, but this better support would be more effective than reducing advantages suddenly.
Only one out of 10 disabled people has received aid to find work each year, said the reflection group. His intervention reflects an increasing fear of disabled charitable organizations which put pressure on the public finances of the United Kingdom will lead ministers to pursue short-term economies to the detriment of vulnerable people, rather than reforms that will be paid in the longer term.
Liz Kendall, Secretary of Works and Pensions, will publish plans to revise health and invalidity services for the working age before the spring declaration of next month. The twin objective is to stimulate employment and reduce spending on advantages – which has increased 40% in real terms since 2013 and is expected to reach 100 billion pounds sterling per year by the end of the decade.
Until now, the emphasis has been placed on approximately 3.5 million people who have received so -called incapacity services after being assessed as too sick to work or to look for work. This group, which has increased by a million people from the pandemic, receives £ 5,000 more per year than those of the basic rate of unemployment benefits, without any requirement to seek work.
L&W said that the combination of biased financial incentives, inadequate support to return to work and the lack of sufficiently flexible employers “created a benefits”.
There has been an even clearer increase from the pandemic, however, in the number of people who receive disability benefits, or personal independence payments – which are paid independently of their employment status to those who are Faced with higher subsistence costs due to their health.
Stephen Evans, director general of L&W, said that it would be a mistake if the ministers rushed to cut and restrict one of these advantages without doing more to help people return to work.
“My concern is that this does not lasting the costs in a lasting way. People are still there and in difficulty. . . In a sensible world, investing a little now will pay in 5 to 10 years, “he said.
The former conservative government had planned to restrict eligibility for incapacity benefits, with an economy of around 1 billion pounds sterling per year between 2026-27 and 2028-20
Labor ministers are now determined to convince the OBR that their own reforms can produce at least as much. But previous well-being reforms have repeatedly failed to reduce costs only expected, which makes the tax guard dog reluctant to “mark” something other than infallible savings.
An option that the government is considering – although it is deeply controversial – consists in fully eliminating incapacity services, channeling all financial aid for patients and disabled through personal independence payments and restarting rules for them.
But the ministers of the Department of Labor and Pensions are also fighting to ensure that at least part of the money saved by restricting services goes to support the disabled to find work.
The L&W report argues that spending around 450 million pounds sterling per year to increase employment support could cause saving of 4 billion pounds per year in the longer term, in the form of lower payments and higher tax receipts.
Evans said that this would double the number of places of employment support, and a new initiative to invite applicants of incapacity to quarterly “conversations” to discuss their options – rather than let them state support for years.
A government spokesperson refused to comment on the details of the green newspaper, but said that the reforms were aimed at ensuring that “sick and disabled people are truly supported at work, while being more equitable on the taxpayer”.
