Blake Lively Subpoenas Cell Carriers In Bid To ‘Expose’ Justin Baldoni

Blake Lively made new movements to obtain “receipts” which will help him prove Justin Baldoni would have launched a defamation campaign against her.

He follows the actress depositing allegations of sexual harassment against her co-star / director “IT ends with us” last December.

Justin Baldoni furiously denied the accusations and also countered Blake Lively for defamation.

Since the accusation of Justin Baldoni of sexual harassment and to promote a toxic working environment, the legal battle of Blake Lively with the director has continued to intensify, the two parties determined to go out in mind.

One of the claims was that Baldoni orchestrated a defamation campaign against her to ruin her reputation, to which Baldoni lawyers retaliated with an answer that the actress’s costume was only done to repair her ” negative reputation “.

Now, according to DeadlineLively seeks to prove the allegation and to counter the recent publication by Baldoni on its own side of history by obtaining “receipts” from transporters of Cloudflare and AOL cells, as well as Jed Wallace, a crisis consultant who was linked At the launch of an “armed digital” against the actress at the request of Baldoni.

Lively lawyers, lawyers Esra Hudson and Michael Gottlieb, confirmed that she had sent assignments to the three, which will force them to publish the necessary telephone recordings relevant to the case.

Lively lawyers also said that by initiating this discovery process, the actress would be able to “expose people, tactics and methods that have worked to” destroy “and” bury “her reputation and family last year lessons ”.

They also pointed out that these “receipts” are “nowhere where Mr. Freedman’s website”, a reference to Baldoni lawyer, Bryan Freedman, and a website where the actor shared his own side quarrel.

In response, Baldoni’s lawyer criticized Lively’s assignments as a “massive fishing expedition” which proves that the actress and her representative “desperately seek any factual basis for their proven false allegations”.

“They ask for each call, text, data journal and even real -time location information in the past 2.5 years, regardless of the sender, the recipient or prove his claims.

In the meantime, Lively already has shocking SMS between the members of the Baldoni public relations team, which, according to her, proves that the actor orchestrated a “plan on several levels” to destroy his reputation.

According to the Daily mailThe messages she included in her costume against Baldoni were sent after expressing concerns about the conditions on the set of their film “IT ends with us”.

The actress allegedly alleged that the public relations team had also discussed a strategy document for Baldoni which identified “several potential scenarios” for which the director should be prepared so animated and his team “make her complaints public”.

Although it was initially clear how the messages were obtained by Lively, a member of his team later revealed that they had been obtained from a phone belonging to the former Baldoni publicist, Jennifer Abel, who would have separated the actor due to “intimidation”.

All of Lively’s accusations were furiously refused by Baldoni, who also filed a defamation of $ 400 million against the actress and a defamation pursuit of $ 250 million against the New York Times for having published his statement.

Recently, he changed his pursuit against Lively to include more complaints due “to the overwhelming quantity of new evidence that has been revealed”, according to the Daily mail.

“This new proof corroborates what we have known from the start, that due to purely selfish reasons, Ms. Live, Freedman, said in a statement.

Freedman also said that “the continuous public interest in this online affair had ironic New York Times And Lively and its representatives “initiated” and were “deeply involved” in the “attempted development and the Baldoni smear campaign.

Justice Lewis Liman, who presides over the legal battle between Lively and Baldoni, recently denied the actress’s request to pass a gap order on the lawyers of his co-star.

Lively and her husband, Ryan Reynolds, had asked the court to make a protective order to prevent Baldoni’s lawyer, Freedman, to engage in “inappropriate conduct”, in particular by making an alleged campaign “of harassment and Media reprisals “against them.

At their request, they alleged that Freedman “violated the legal rules which prevent a lawyer from making statements to the press which are not relevant to a case and could harm the jury”.

However, judge Liman rejected the couple’s request and rather declared that he would adopt a rule for lawyers known as rule 3.6, which prevents the two parties from making extrajudicial declarations which could influence the jury.

“I expect the parties to respect their ethical obligations. I do not expect this affair to turn into satellite disputes on the comments of a lawyer,” said Liman, according to the Daily mail. “The two have said a lot in procedural acts that give the public a lot of regulations.”