Simon Cowell wants to see artists protected against AI.
Judge “America’s Got Talent” wrote comments in The Daily Mail This week, criticizing the potential changes in British law that would allow companies to use any online material to form AI models unless they undress explicitly.
Cowell warned that artists’ means of subsistence were likely to “be destroyed”.
“The thought that anyone would believe that he has the right to blindly give the creative ideas of this country – for nothing – is simply false,” he said. “I care passionate about people’s personal creativity – and AI should not be able to steal the talent of these humans who created magic in the first place.”
Simon Cowell warned in an editorial in the Daily Mail that allowing AI to train on material protected by copyright is a threat to the means of subsistence of artists. (Images Kevin Winter / Getty)
What is artificial intelligence (AI)?
In 2023 Cowell told Fox News Digital that he was “not a fan” of the AI.
He explained why artists like Queen, David Bowie and Elton John have a lasting and authentic impact by noting that “their songs, I think, are as good today as they were. So, everything that pretends, for me, a little problem.”
Elton John also contributed to his opinion on AI at Daily Mail.
Watch: “ not a fan ‘from Simon Cowell of artificial intelligence in music
Click here to register for the Entertainment Newsletter
“I am standing in the name of young artists because they literally represent our future. The proposal considered by the British government would deviate from our creative community, in particular emerging artists and those who aspire to a career in the arts.”
“AI should not be able to steal the talent of these humans who created magic in the first place.”
He continued: “This would allow our music to be taken – and all the other works of art never carried out in the United Kingdom – without authorization or compensation. And for what? To help powerful foreign technology companies to make profits. It is simply false and it is useless.”
The singer “Tiny Dancer” recognized that generative AI “offers incredible opportunities for all of us” but wanted to ensure protections for all creations.
Elton John called on changes proposed to British laws to allow AI companies to train in work protected by copyright “just badly, and it is not necessary”. (Simone Joyner / Getty Images)
Do you like what you read? Click here for more entertainment news
“We must respect the rights of creators, offer great experiences for fans and offer new and young artists even brighter. But the adoption of this copyright exception would destroy the leadership of the United Kingdom which was hard, and what is worse, that would give it all. For nothing.”
Earlier this week, more than 1,000 musicians have teamed up to release a silent album entitled “Do we want?” To protest against the changes proposed to the laws.
With contributions from British artists, notably Kate Bush, Annie Lennox, Cat Stevens and Damon Albarn, the album consists of 12 pieces of empty studios and performance spaces “to symbolize what we expect from if the government’s proposals have declared,” said the composer and developer AI Ed Newton-Rex.
Annie Lennox, on the left, with the group’s comrade of Eurythmics, Dave Stewart, in 2022, is one of the thousands of artists who contributed to a silent album to protest against the British laws around AI and the change of copyright. (Richard Shotwell / Invivision / AP)
Click here to get the Fox News app
“It is a mixture of artists that everyone has heard of and, you know, and many musicians who are not familiar names,” he added. “And I think it’s really important because this problem will affect us all.”
