Match 2 of Premier League Female (WPL) 2025 saw a high intensity meeting between Delhi Capitals (DC) And Mumbai Indians (Mi) in a packaged stadium. The match delivered everything from dramatic counters, drama, zero moments and last -ball controversy that stole the spotlight. Delhi snatched a victory with two gates in a breathtaking end, with a crucial call on the final ball in favor of Delhi, a decision that sparked animated debates on social networks.
Delhi’s Bâton Domination of Capitals against Mumbai Indians
Chasing a difficult target of 165 points, Delhi started in style, thanks to the flamboyant blow of Shafali Varmawhich provided a quick start. The right -hander took the attack in Mumbai’s quisors, by dispatching the limits with authority and by setting up in favor of Delhi. However, his dismissal triggered a mini-affective, with Delhi struggling with 109/5 in 14.5 overs, bringing Mumbai back in the competition. At this critical stage, the partnership between Niki Prasad And Sarah Bryce He turned out to be the turn, while the duo stabilized the sleeves and deviates from the target. Despite the assembly pressure, they showed a remarkable calculation, ultimately bringing the equation to 10 points required from the final.
Controversial decision of the last ball which divided opinions
With two necessary points on the final ball, the tension has reached its peak. Arundhati Reddy I played an air shot on the off-quote side, cleaning the field but not finding the border. Mumbai captain Harmanpreet Kaur Sprinta after the ball and pulled a punctual throw at the end of the goalkeeper, where a racing opportunity arose. While Arundhati plunged complete to finish the second round, the zing berries flashed, which caused immediate calls from Mumbai players. The moment was the razor, and the third referee was called for action for a meticulous review.
Also look: Shabnim Ismail celebrates aggressively after rejecting Meg Lanning in WPL 2025
The replay has shown that the sureties were lighting before the Arundhati bat was completely crossing the fold, leading to a moment of uncertainty. Traditionally, in cricket, a paste is considered when the balls completely lose contact with the stumps. However, under the modern rule of LED Zing Zing berries, the counter is deemed deposited at the precise moment that the lights light up, marking the first image in which the baths are disturbed. After an in -depth examination, the third referee ruled that Arundhati was not released, confirming Delhi’s victory by the narrowest margins.
– lolzzz (@CRICKTETTERMASKED) February 15, 2025
It is unacceptable. The third referee has no idea of the playing conditions when LED strains are used.
Here is what the # WPL2025 The document says: pic.twitter.com/uqttdsokwv
– Hemant brar (@hemantbrar_) February 15, 2025
Parth Jindal shares his position on the referee’s decision
The dramatic conclusion sparked a fierce debate on social media, with divided opinions on the question of whether the third referee had appealed. Some estimated that the guarantees had already been disrupted before Arundhati ended his dive, while others argued that the decision was in accordance with existing laws. Addition to the controversy, the Delhi Capitals co -owner Parth jindal expressed his gratitude to the referees, congratulating their ability to remain composed in a high pressure situation.
“Some @ wplt20 @ delhicapitals, ”wrote Parth.
Whatever the result of the WPL in progress, I must applaud the 3rd referee which is absolutely world class – to make this kind of decision and bring back the replay so many executives under so much pressure is a world class @ wplt20 @Delhicapital
– Parth Jindal (@ parthjindal11) February 15, 2025
Read also: Highly facts: Delhi’s capitals go beyond Mumbai Indians in an exciting meeting WPL 2025
This article was published for the first time at Womecriccket.comA Times cricket company.
