Of course, there are many variable factors to include here. Rotting tomatoes, for example, were not officially launched before 2000 and did not become a remarkable cultural force in 2003 or 2004. “Strange New Worlds”, for example, has 87 criticisms, while “Star Trek: The Animated Series” (classified third, with a 94%approval note) has only 18. Critics of their first episodes and do not represent a global litigation of the series in question, ex post facto. The 90s’ shows were tried as a whole, while “Strange New Worlds” was judged perhaps five episodes.
“Star Trek: The Next Generation” finished fourth on the RT list with a 91%approval rating, while “Deep Space Nine” almost equally “lower disks” with 91%approval, only with less criticism.
Curiously, less attractive nu-up shows like “Star Trek: Discovery” and “Star Trek: Picard” have always collected a lot of positive response, at least at the beginning. “Picard” has an 89%approval note, which brings it to # 7, while “Disco”, the first Nu-Trek series, is in 8th with an 84. These programs are strongly disputed, and / film recorded why they do not work very well. The 1966 “Star Trek” original series of 1966, with an approval of 80%. This is based on 42 opinions, however, some of them vintage.
At the bottom of the list is “Star Trek: Voyager” (76%) at # 10, and finally, at No. 11, “Star Trek: Enterprise” (56%).
Nu-Trek emissions can boast: on average, they have an approval of 91.8%. Fans of the two original programs can get comfort knowing that their average is 87%, but trek fans of the 90s will be injured to learn that their four emissions say to 78.75%.
