The trio shares many more specifications, such as the way they all have a 6.7 -inch Amoled screen with a 120 Hz refreshment rate, a 5,000 mAh battery capacity, and they even have the same types of cameras that consist of a 50 megapixel, ultrairs and macro objective, although the number of megapixels changes for some. Three cameras on the back may seem impressive at these prices, but ultra-receptor and macro cameras on low-budget phones are generally not very good, so it will be interesting to see if this is still the case here or if these cameras will be useful.
These are not only megapixels. Samsung specifically calls the Selfie A36 camera (and probably the A56) – they can have fewer megapixels than the A26, but this 12 -megapixel shooter is capable of 10 -bit HDR sequences up to 4K at 30 images per second. It just means that it will do a better job by representing colors in selfie videos.
Samsung says that the A36 and the A56 have a larger steam cooling system for better heat dissipation during intense treatment activities such as play, and that this system is almost the same size as the Galaxy S24 + from last year. They also support a fast load of 45 watts, which should allow you 70% in 30 minutes.
IA performance
The main domain where they all differentiate are performance. The A26 5G and A56 5G use the own Exynos processors from Samsung, in particular the Exynos 1380 with 6 GB of RAM and Exynos 1580 with 8 GB of RAM, respectively. The configuration of the Galaxy A26 seems to be the same as that of the Galaxy A35 5G from last year, which had decent performance but was still somewhat stuck. But this phone was launched at $ 400 while the A26 is $ 100 less.
Only the Galaxy A36 5G has a Qualcomm chipset, the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, a new chipset announced at the end of last year, although performance should be similar to the Snapdragon 7S Gen 2 found in many international phones, such as Poco X6.
