Blake Lively May Finally Be Regretting Her Lawsuit Against Justin Baldoni

The alum of “Gossip Girl” accused his sexual harassment co-star on the set of the film, while Baldoni, in his counter-communion, alleges that she worked behind the scenes to fight against the creative control of the film far from her.

Although many disclosed text messages have cast a doubt about Lively’s claims, it seemed to be taking its accusations in judgment, with a hearing date for March 2026. However, it can be ready to change your mind now that intimate information about her family is threatened to be exposed.

However, it seems that text messages could be the least of her concerns, as she fears sensitive medical information on her family could be disclosed to the public before the start of the trial. Thursday, their respective legal teams were present to Yet another hearingIn which her lawyers have expressed their concern that sensitive information about her and her family, such as her security arrangements and medical information, could be disclosed to the press.

His lawyers said that details on his children or even “deep mental problems” would be disclosed to the press if the Baldoni team had this information. At this stage, it is not clear if Lively has “deep mental problems” or if his lawyers simply try to suggest that Baldoni will use all the information he can to paint it in a bad light.

But, given his legal team which evokes alleged “deep mental problems” that the actress could or not, it seems that the Baldoni team does not have to work so hard, since the alleged “problems” of Livering make the titles anyway.

During the hearing, the Baldoni team rejected the “offensive” idea that they would never disclose the medical or mental health problems of someone to the press. They also talked about the attempts by Lively’s lawyer to protect conversations with her husband, Ryan Reynolds, and her famous famous friends, noting that she was asking for a “different law” to keep these private exchanges.

Lively’s lawyer, Meryl Governskii, had previously declared that he was trying to prevent “irreparable damage” in Lively, Reynolds, and their respective teams by asking for an “lawyer only” on their case in order to protect “trade secrets”.

The Lively legal team insisted that she had to protect her family and her family from a possible “reprisal campaign” which would have been launched by Baldoni and his camp, noting that Baldoni had assigned a security business that works with the couple. When judge Lewis Liman asked if Governskii insinuated that Baldoni lawyers were “a risk” for Lively’s “security”, she said no, they did not do it.

Lively’s lawyer also said that Baldoni had an “unlimited budget” to bring it down and “committed $ 100 million to ruin the life of Ms. Lively and her family”, which is a pretty heavy sum for a director whose most people had never heard until Blake Lively has filed his trial.

Elsewhere during the hearing, Governskii suggested that the Baldoni legal team would always disclose private information from Lively because it alleges, “the value of public relations is greater than that of the orders of the court”.

While Baldoni’s lawyer, Bryan Freedman, said that he was “rather offensive than anyone who suggests that we do not take into account a protective order”, he also insinuated that Lively and his family were looking for special treatment because of their celebrity status.

“This is like what the other side requires, it is because there are celebrities, because there are powerful people in the industry that they are treated differently, in a way, there is a different law which applies to them who, otherwise, would not apply to ordinary normal people,” he said during the hearing.

Freedman “would not dispute” that Lively’s medical records should be kept confidential and reject the idea that they would disclose information on his security details to the press, noting that he was “not even relevant at a distance” for the test.

He called his concerns “a complete trick”, adding: “I don’t even know why it arises and why it is even a concern.” However, he noted that the addresses of Baldoni had already been disclosed to the public in court documents deposited by Lively, which he deemed “very offensive and useless”.

At this point, it seems that Lively is again to respect the rules for mentality and not for me. Baldoni’s addresses have already been disclosed in her file, but it seems concerned only by the protection in which she lives, as well as other sensitive information. She previously declared that her four children had been “traumatized” by the trial (the oldest is 9 years old, the youngest is 2), but Baldoni also has two children who are well aware of what is happening.

Suffering from sexual harassment is horrible, but the same goes for a father who is potentially accused of such to settle the vendetta behind the scenes they have. The assertion of his lawyer that the Baldoni legal team would disclose his “deep mental problems” – that no one even suggested to him until his own lawyer raises him before the court – is a bizarre decision that would probably not earn them points with the judge, who has already blocked his request for newspapers and SMS of Baldoni.

If she is so afraid that the Baldoni legal team discloses her private conversations with her famous friends, her medical and alleged mental health problems, and details on her security team, then she should seek a settlement quickly and wait for everything to explode in the constantly advances news cycle.

After all, it doesn’t end with us. It ends with her.