Individuals, industrial groups and local governments have submitted more than 10,000 comments to the White House about its national IA policy, also known as the AI action plan. The Office of the White House Science and Technological Policy (OSTP) published The text of the submissions in a PDF covering 18,480 pages.
The comments, which approach subjects ranging from copyright to environmental misdeeds of AI data centers, come as President Donald Trump and the Allies refer the priorities of the US government AI.
In January, President Trump repealed the executive decree of former president Joe Biden, who had instructed the National Institute of Standards and Technology to the Authors who help companies to identify – and to correct – defects in models, including prejudices. Critics Allied to Trump argued that the declaration requirements were expensive and indeed forced companies to disclose their commercial secrets.
Shortly after revoking the AI decree, Trump signed an order ordering federal agencies to promote the development of AI “free of ideological biases” which promotes “human development, economic competitiveness and national security”. Above all, the order of Trump made no mention to fight against the discrimination of AI, which was a key principle of Biden’s initiative.
Comments submitted to the White House clearly indicate what is at stake in the AI race.
A certain number of commentators have said that AI was the user, in a word, trained on the works of creatives who are not compensated for their involuntary contributions and have asked the Trump administration to strengthen copyright regulations. On the opposite side, commentators such as the company of VC Andreessen Horowitz have accused right -handers of setting up roadblocks to the development of AI.
Several AI companies, including Google and Openai, have also been pressure for more user -friendly rules concerning AI training in previous AI action plan.
Petitions of organizations such as Americans for prosperity, the Future of Life Institute and the American Academy of Nursing stressed the importance of investments in research at a time when the federal government reduces scientific subsidies. IA experts Criticized the recent Cups of the Trump administration to scientific realization, and in particular, reductions defended by the Ministry of Elon Musk’s government efficiency.
Some AI action plan commentators have targeted the Trump administration’s extensive prices on foreign products, which suggests that they can affect the efforts of interior AI. The Data Center Coalition, a professional association representing the data center sector, says that the fares on infrastructure components “will limit and slow down” investments in American AI. Elsewhere, the Information Technology Industry Council, a defense group for defenders whose members include Amazon, Intel and Microsoft, have urged the “intelligent” prices which “protect national industries without increasing the commercial wars that harm consumers”.
Only a handful of comments mentioned the “censorship of the AI”, a subject of mind for many confidants close to Trump. Elon Musk and Crypto and AI “Czar” David Sacks allegedly alleged that popular chatbots are censoring conservative points of view, with bags emissary Chatgpt in particular as a lie on politically sensitive subjects.
In truth, the AI bias is an intractable technical problem. The AI of Musk, Xai, has itself struggled to create a chatbot which does not approve of political opinions on others.
President Trump has increased his efforts to bring together an AI political team in recent months.
In March, the Senate confirmed Trump’s choice for the director of the OSTP, Michael Kratsios, who focused on AI’s policy in the OSTP during Trump’s first mandate. Towards the end of last year, Trump appointed former VC Sriram Krishnan as the White House’s main policy advisor for AI.
