The “Roundable Barron’s” panelists Jack Hough, Al Root and Megan Leonhardt discuss the first three titles of the week.
Google is targeting the efforts of the Ministry of Justice to revise its search engine a few days before an audience by the Federal Court, the senior executives of companies describing the reforms proposed by the government as “wild in the field” and posing potential risks for consumers, companies and the national security landscape.
Friday, a google senior executive presented the company’s counter argument in an interview with Fox News Digital, noting that, in their opinion, the appeals proposed by the Ministry of Justice are “very large” and going to kilometers beyond “of what the court ordered in August, when the American district judge Amit Mehta took the side of the government and ruled that Google illegal in the online sector.
The cure of remedy proposed by the Ministry of Justice includes steps such as chrome disinvestment, Google Internet browser and perhaps Android; The requirements for Google to disclose its consumption data and its consumption research requests with other companies for the next 10 years, including companies outside the United States; And general options for “self-preferization”, which would limit users access to innovative integrations, including AI, Google Translate and Google Lens features, which allows users to search for their photos or use their camera.
Zuckerberg endures early grills on the 1 day of Meta Monopoly Trial
A mobile phone displays Google search in Colombo, Sri Lanka, January 23, 2024. (Thilina Kaluthotage / Nurphoto via Getty Images / Getty Images)
THE Department of Justice accused Google to maintain its monopoly over the years by paying internet browsers and smartphone manufacturers, such as Apple and Samsung, so that their search engine is automatically appearing on their devices.
And while Google challenges the court’s decision and plans to appeal the case, the company also sees a danger in appeal by the regulations that the government has submitted to court, Kent Walker, president of Google World Affairs, told Fox News Digital in an interview.
On the eve of the hearing on the 15 -day evidence, which starts on Monday in Washington, DC, Walker described Google’s concerns concerning the government plan – noting that, in their opinion, the Ministry of Justice’s proposal to break the Google search engine operations will “beyond” of the relief ordered by the Federal Court.
“We are very concerned about the DoJ’s proposal,” Walker told Fox News Digital. “We think that would harm American consumers, our economy, our technological leadership, even national security.”
Google leaders described it as an “extreme proposal” that would endanger security and confidentiality for millions; Cool investments in AI; And hurt the innovative services, including Mozilla Firefox, which depend on Google for research.
Whistleblower said to the Senate Committee
The courthouse of E. Barrett Prettman Us is seen in Washington, DC (Images Kevin Dietsch / Getty / Getty Images)
The proposed reform of the doj “would lead to an unprecedented surpassing of the government which would harm consumers, developers and small American companies – and would endanger the world’s economic and technological leadership in America when it is most necessary” said in a blog article Shortly after the publication of the DoJ’s proposal.
In addition to the steps described above, the DOJ reform proposal includes general options for “self-reflection”, which would limit users’ access to innovative integrations currently grouped in Google research-including AI, Google Translate results and the new Google lentils, a feature that allows users to search for a photo or cameras Walker in an interview.
This week, the company has submitted an alternative appeal proposal, which more precisely says the research distribution contracts which were at the heart of the Antitrust affair.
“The basic discovery here was that we were paying to distribute the search in a way that made more difficult for competitors to compete,” Walker told Fox News Digital. “So our proposals deal with this and say:” Well, okay, we will adjust our contracts so that we do not pay for the whole point of access through a device. “”
This includes shorter contracts for browser companies, such as Apple and Mozilla; New contracts with Android, to allow additional flexibility and the preload option of several search engines; And other important steps to make the landscape more competitive, he said.
“In short, the remedies proposed by Google tackle much more than the specific conduct that the court deemed anti -competitive in the phase of responsibility of this case and offer competitors the possibility of innovating and competing on the substance in the future while preserving the incentives for Google innovation,” wrote the technological giant in its legal file.
Now, the appeal subject to the Federal Court will require that it will take certain measures to rectify these perceived wrongs.
Get Fox Affairs on the move by clicking here
Google has long paid Apple to pre-install software on its iPhones. (Josh Edelson / AFP via Getty Images / Getty Images)
The victory of the Ministry of Justice in the case last year is important-it marked the first successful antitrust trial brought by the United States against a large technological company from the United States v. Microsoft in 2001.
But it is not clear if his relief plan will be also successful.
“It looks like a rear case, [dealing with] Things that happened 10 years ago, in an unprecedented era of innovation, “Walker said about the Doj reform proposal.
Lawyers from Google and the Ministry of Justice will meet on Monday for the hearing of use in Washington, DC
