The technician’s job has sparked a heated debate over entry-level salaries in India’s IT sector.
Abhishek Nair supported the idea that Rs 3.6 lakh per year is not a bad deal for freshers without strong credentials or relevant skills.
“I might get in trouble, but this needs to be said: 3.6 LPA is not bad if you come from a 500 level college and lack programming skills. Don’t expect a 1Cr package without a strong project portfolio. Don’t expect much if the highlight of your CV is your bachelor’s degree,” he wrote, sparking a storm of reactions.
Some users supported Nair’s argument, pointing out that a lack of practical skills often holds graduates back.
A user wrote: “I recently interviewed an IIT graduate. Even though he knew advanced concepts like Fibonacci Heap, he failed to apply them effectively. The real problem is that many students lack application skills, regardless of their academic level.
Others reacted, saying Nair’s message ignored broader systemic issues. “Inflation exists! The salary of a newcomer in 2004 cannot be the same as in 2024. Offering 3.6 LPA today is exploitative,” said a frustrated commenter.
Some commentators have rejected the assumption that graduates from top-tier institutions are inherently more deserving. One noted, “What I disagree with is the idea that a tier 1 student deserves a 1 crore package and is inherently a genius. Success is about skills, not rankings.
In response to the criticism, Nair clarified his position. He emphasized that his comments were aimed at newcomers with minimal skills or notable achievements, not all graduates.
“I’m not asking anyone to settle for less. If you feel undervalued, it’s probably time to look for a better role or organization,” he explained.
