If there is a guarantee on the Oscars, it is because the show will present jokes over the duration of the ceremony itself. Sometimes these jokes prevail from afar on the number of ceremonies that take place in fact for a long time. In addition, this is undoubtedly equally true for other major prices shows, such as the Golden Globes and Emmys, but it often seems the most precise on the Oscars.
The concept is quite simple: because the Oscars are broadcast on network television, even with reality that this is a live event to which a certain number of things could occur unexpectedly, the series must To end at one point – even if it means that certain prices get truncated or the speeches are interrupted. The latter is the most common thing; We have all seen an acceptance speech being cut whatever happens, and sometimes it doesn’t matter who is in front of the camera. Yes, for the latest Grands Prix, like the best actor or the best actress, people who direct the show tend to let the winners go a little in their speeches (but only a little).
Of course, it is just as true that the Oscars have distributed gold statuettes since before the advent of television. While the Academy approaches quickly 100 years of award ceremonies, they have only been broadcast on television since March 1953 (when the best Oscar went to the possible television series that has become the film “The Greatest Show on Earth”)) . Maybe this explains the fact that once, an acceptance speech has gone for a long time – like, like six minutes Long – and always manages to be among the deepest and most touching price monologues ever recovered. But even if it can be true, it is also potentially the reason why acceptance speeches never reach such lengths.
Greer Garson’s acceptance speech for Ms. Miniver has set an Oscars record
As she played in the 1942 drama “Mrs. Miniver” by director William Wyler, Greer Garson had already been nominated twice for the best actress at the Oscars. The film, in which she plays the titular character, would not only guarantee the actor of her third global appointment, but will also mark the second of the five consecutive heads that Garson obtained in the category. To date, her seven nominations of the best actress make her of her fourth time in the category.
“Ms. Miniver” was a great success at the Oscar ceremony which took place on March 4, 1943, where he also won the best film, the best director and the best support actress. It is also a notable element in the history of the Oscars because it is the first big winner of the Oscars to focus specifically on the Second World War (as well as the first film to receive five distinct interim nominations). So, in some ways, the fact that a) guy has won the Oscar and b) she had a lot of track to go to her acceptance speech for a long time should not surprise. The victories of the film were not unexpected either; It was a film that almost everyone provided that would have repercussions on all other candidates in its categories, as when “Titanic” won 11 of the 14 Oscars in the late 1990s.
Guyon took her shot when she only won Oscar and went to his speech for a long time
What is honestly remarkable in the Garson’s acceptance speech is that the sections that survived decades via Newsreel Do not even compose the full speechYet they still represent about four minutes of what she said on stage. Anyone with a temporary familiarity of the awards ceremony will not be too shocked by the general arc of what Garson had to say, to recognize how important and significant to be nominated to rent the other main actors of the film itself. It should also be noted that Garson came to the United States in the late 1930s, making him a fairly recent immigrant when winning the trophy. Given the impact of the Second World War on Hollywood and the world as a whole, it is not a shock that Garson recognized the bigger moment, declaring: “[P]raise from our government and our armed forces and abroad […] should make us determined to continue. “”
Guys also spent a lot of time grateful What this meant was a recent transplant for states, the kind of exciting feeling which is too premonitory to hear in the year of our Lord 2025. On the other hand, we must note that Garson tends to divide more A little; The fact that she was able to quote “Alice In Wonderland” by Lewis Carroll in the middle of her speech is both exemplary and a good sign that she wanted to milk her time on stage as much as possible. Yes, it is applicable that the dodo apparently said: “Everyone has won and everyone will have a price” compared to nominees at the Oscars who are full winners to obtain the head sign, but at the same time , this is the kind of thing that is guaranteed to have you play by the orchestra these days.
Garson’s long speech had an impact that is still felt during price discounts today
In 2010, the timing is quite simple: the Oscars winners obtained 45 seconds for their acceptance speeches. Again, this is not always true, because the recent winners like Cillian Murphy and Christopher Nolan to “Oppenheimer” may have obtained a little latitude, taking into account the prices they accept as well as the film itself- even. But the general rule is that, with a few exceptions, you have less than a minute. We cannot know with certainty if the speech of acceptance of Garson was the straw which broke the back of the camel. (Although there have been news images of the event, the regular annual television productions of the ceremony would not occur for another decade.) But many think that its long monologue, as much the power to be Welcomed in the American film industry as a polished the comments on the power to be appointed by your peers, this is what prompted the Oscars to firmly encourage his winners to keep things tight.
The idea of a long -term acceptance discourse to the Oscars can see an anathema in the industry, if not only the disseminated network of the ceremony. But even if Guyon could probably have kept things a little brighter, the fact that she goes up on stage and that she spoke extensively for so long, succeeding in doing everything without having written anything in advance (the YouTube link Above can only show a brief piece of her speech, but she does not read cards or other), is quite incredible. All of today’s winners, even among the main categories of actor, rarely attracts public attention in the same way, and when they do, it is generally because they go great in the way they accept, not as a monologue. (Think of something like Cuba Gooding, Jr.’s freckle has not yet repeated acceptance for “Jerry Maguire”.) Guyon had her big blow when she won her only Oscar to “Mrs. Miniver” and managed to deliver an unforgettable and only one Oscar to “Mrs. Miniver” and managed to deliver an unforgettable and only one impact the acceptance discourse which set the tone by Inadvertance for the decades to come, even if today’s winners may not realize it.
