The candidates of President Donald Trump to direct the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are part of a group of scientists who have just launched a new research review focused on the stimulation of scientific discourse and The fight against the “crime” in research community of research.
The newspaper, entitled The Journal of the Academy of Public Health (JAPH), includes a editorial committee made up of several scientists who complained of censorship during the Pandemic COVID-19.
Japh’s Co-Founders included Martin Kulldorff, A Train Harvard Medical School Professor Who is a Founding Fellow at Hillsdale College’s Academy for Science and Freedom, and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, A Professor of Health Policy at Stanford University who is Also Trump’s Nominee Director NIH Next. Kulldorff and Bhattacharya became known during the pandemic for having created the Great Barrington Declaration, which sought to challenge the wider concepts of the medical community on the attenuation strategies of COVVI -19, arguing that – in the long term – The locking people were faced with it would hurt than good.
CDC staff said to remove terms like “non -binary”, they “,` `pregnant” public health equipment
Dr. Marty Makary, surgeon and researcher in public policy at Johns Hopkins University, who is Trump’s candidate to be the next director of the FDA, is also part of the journal’s editorial committee.
Dr. Jay Bhattacharya of Stanford, on the left, appears alongside Dr. Marty Makary of Johns Hopkins University. (Getty Images / Fox News)
Japh adopts a new approach by publishing peers of important studies of other journals that do not make their peers exams accessible to the public. The effort aims to stimulate scientific discourse, said Kulldorff in an article describing the objectives of the creation of the review.
The review will also seek to promote “open access” by putting all its work available to all public members without a timely and effective time wall, “to prevent any potential” porter “.
“Scientific journals have had a huge positive impact on the development of science, but in some respects, they now hinder rather than improving open scientific discourse,” Kulldorff said. “After examining the history and current problems with journals, a new model of university publication is proposed – it includes free access and the opening of the examination of rigorous peers, it rewards examiners for their important work With fees and public recognition and it allows scientists to publish their research in a timely and effective way without wasting time and resources of precious scientists.
‘What a scam! “: Trump triggers the backlash after having reduced the billions of general costs of research subsidies NIH
Kulldorff, Bhattacharya, Makary and other members of the management team of the new review have complained that their opinions on the COVVI-19 pandemic were censored. These are points of view which were often contrary to the dominant ideas proposed by the broader medical community at the time, which concerned subjects such as the effectiveness of vaccines, natural immunity, locking and more.
(Censorship was a common complaint of medical researchers like Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Dr. Marty Makary and Dr. Martin Kulldorff, who were among the few scientists who promoted ideas like the immunity of the herd and disputed the Efficiency of locking and vaccine mandates.)
“Big Tech censored on [sic] All kinds of sciences on natural immunity, “said Makary testimony to the congress following the pandemic. During his testimony, Makary also explained how one of his own studies at Johns Hopkins during the pandemic who has favored the effectiveness of natural immunity, that a scientific review is a scientific review.
“Because of my opinions on COVVI-19 restrictions, I was specifically targeted for censorship by federal government officials,” added Bhattacharya in his own testimony to Congress the same year.
Kulldorff, who also complained about the censorship of his opinions on COVID-19, argued that he had been invited to leave his professor of medicine at Harvard that he has held since 2003, to “hang on to The truth “in his opposition to covid-19 locking and vaccinated and vaccine mandates.
The conservative law firm launches its investigation into five major universities for an alleged “censorship regime”
Dr. Martin Kulldorff is a former professor of the Harvard Medical School. (Getty Images)
“JAPH will ensure quality thanks to the revision of open peers, but will not manage new and important ideas for established Orthodoxies,” Fox News Digital Andrew Noymer, the editor -in -chief of Japh told Fox News. .
“To choose an example, in my own sub-champ of the epidemiology of infectious diseases, we have seen in recent years a scholarship too little published on the origins of Sars-Cov-2, the virus which causes an academic publication .
Click here to obtain the Fox News app
Bhattacharya and Makary did not wish to comment on this article.
