Blake Lively Fears ‘Mental Health Issues’ Are At Risk Of Being Leaked

The couple made a request to keep their texts with confidential “high -level” people, citing concerns that the Baldoni camp can disclose them to the press.

However, Justin Baldoni’s lawyer, Bryan Freedman, retaliated to Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds, calling their “useless” proposal.

Lively and Reynolds want their conversations to be kept private while their in progress in progress against Baldoni salaries.

During a hearing in front of the Manhattan Federal Court on Thursday, lawyer Meryl Conant Governski said that the couple wanted a protective prescription replaced before disclosing conversations with “high -level” people on live time Roller.

The lawyer explained before the court that these texts would have a high “public relations value”, whether or not relevant for the case.

“There is an important chance of irreparable damage if marginal conversations with people of high level without relevance for the case were to fall into bad hands,” said Governski.

“There are 100 million reasons why these parties disclose information because the value of public relations is greater than that of court orders,” added the lawyer.

According to the media, Lively’s lawyer went further to urge judge Lewis Liman to place an additional safety layer, known as the lawyer’s eyes only “, for such texts, as well as information on the mental health of the parties and the safety measures they have taken in the middle of the quarrel.

Governski stressed that such an appointment must be placed on information that included “talking about children, deep mental health problems or places of private residences or houses”.

When Liman asked Governski if she suggested that Baldoni lawyers put a “risk” for the security of Reynold and Reynold, the lawyer said “no”.

However, Governski noted that Baldoni co-accused include people “whose whole life is based on the provision of information to press and content creators.”

Baldoni’s lawyer, Bryan Freedman, has since responded to the request of the power couple, claiming that it was “useless” and “offensive that anyone suggests that we will ignore a protective order”.

Freedman added that the living plan and Reynolds would unjustly treat “celebrities” and “powerful people in industry” differently from others.

He also explained that a so -called “model” protection order which had been subject to the court to prohibit the leak of sensitive information in the case already offers sufficient protection.

“My clients have the right to defend themselves, they have the right to transparency,” he said in court, according to the New York PostAdding that its proposed configuration is not supposed to be “abused” alive.

Judge Liman did not immediately transmit his decision, saying that he will give his point of view “soon”. However, he warned that, since the case aroused a public interest, “there is a presumption of public access” in the federal courthouses.

Liman added that the existing conditions of the proposed protection order would already prevent third parties from fleeing press -sensitive information, adding that such leaks may be held by court, thus risking a fine or even a prison sentence.

It comes after Liman suggested on Tuesday that he could reject the New York Times As a defendant in the Baldoni trial against Lively.

The star of “Jane The Virgin” denied allegations of sexual harassment on which the actress of “Gossip Girl” criticized her and filed a defamation of $ 250 million against her and the media, who published her allegations.

He subsequently followed with a complaint of $ 400 million against Lively, Reynolds, and their publicist, Leslie Sloane, accusing them of a conspiracy in order to destroy his reputation and to tear him off from the film.

However, judge Liman said that the New York Times’ On February 28, the request to be excluded from the case offered “substantial reasons for dismissal” and “a solid demonstration that his request in rejection is likely to succeed on the merits”.

The recent hearing in the court comes after the assignment of Lively requested access to more than two years of appeal and text data of the director was rejected by Judge Liman.

Lively had asked for “documents concerning workers’ calls or text messages … within December 1, 2022 to the present day.”

However, Liman ruled in favor of Baldoni, saying that the request for Lively could lead to the publication of sensitive information related to doctors and psychologists and communications with people who are not linked to their case.

The judge also questioned Lively’s reason to request data on calls and the two -year -old text before the alleged campaign of smear in 2024 of Baldoni.

“Lively mainly maintains that the assignments to appear will help to identify” the largest network of individuals who has perpetuated a negative media campaign against it, “said Liman judge, according to the Daily mail.

He continued: “But according to the complaint of Lively, this negative campaign started only about August 2024 … It is therefore difficult to know how the communications and the Wayfarer parties in 2022 and 2023 would reveal people who participated in the campaign.”