‘Harry Potter’ Star Blasts J.K. Rowling For Celebrating Anti-Trans Court Ruling

The in progress controversy surrounding Jk VeilOpinions on gender identity have taken another dramatic tour, such as “Harry Potter” star Sean Biggerstaff publicly called the author.

The ePlosion came in response to Rowling celebrating a recent decision of the British Supreme Court that transgender women are not legally women.

In addition to Sean Biggerstaff, other “Harry Potter” stars, including the main actors Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and Rupert Grint, disagree with the views of JK Rowling on trans women.

JK Rowling is again in the fire of an alumni of “Harry Potter” for his negative opinions on trans women.

This time, she was criticized by Sean Biggerstaff, who played in the Fantasy Movie franchise as Oliver Wood.

It started with Rowling sharing a controversial position of his celebration of a recent decision of the British Supreme Court against trans women being legally women.

In the position, Rowling could be seen raising a drink filled with what seemed to be alcohol while smoking a cigar aboard its $ 150 million Superyacht.

The post led him to face accusations of “smoking a blood stroke”, which the billionaire author applauded social networks by strongly clarifying that he was “objectively, proven and manifestly a cigar”.

Biggerstaff then responded to his post, saying: “Fanatism rots the mind.”

Doubled on his criticism, Harry Potter’s star also retwe -based an article from a social media user who compared the acclaimed author to Andrew Tate, an influencer of a red pill known to blow on cigars in many of his videos.

“Lol, blowing on a cigar now? Is she Andrew Tate?” The tweet read, according to the Daily mail.

In a different article, Biggerstaff criticized Rowling as a “obsessed billionaire”, showing his disgust on the author who would finish the campaign group who brought the case against trans women.

Rowling had first shared a photo of the head women in the case, Susan Smith and Marion Calder, adding the remark “in case it was not clear: not F -K with the Scottish women”.

Biggerstaff then quoted the message with: “The majority of Scottish women, who do not agree with these D-TCHEADS, are not in detour by an obsessed billionaire.”

Aside from his Rowling criticism, Biggerstaff also expressed his support for trans women in light of the controversial decision of the Supreme Court.

He wrote that the “noisiest voices” “used the concern of sex based on sex as a cover of an entirely reactionary policy” and qualified their behavior as “the performance of pragmatism to collect their instinctive disgust for the other”.

In the past, the “Harry Potter” trio, Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and Rupert Grint, have also disagreed with Rowling’s opinions on the Transgender community.

This led them to have a tense relationship with Rowling, who culminated with her openly declaring that she could not “forgive” the trio or other celebrities who support trans people.

“Celebrities that have lived up to a movement determined to erode the hard rights of women and who have used their platforms to encourage the transition of minors can save their apologies for traumatized detransitioners and vulnerable women who depend on unique sexual spaces,” Rowling on X at the time, according to the Daily mail.

“The children were irreversibly injured, and thousands of people are accomplices, not only doctors, but mouths of celebrities, undisputed media and cynical societies,” she added later.

Rowling then approached the movement as a scandal whose “consequences” will be felt for decades and have still doubled his criticisms of his supporters.

She said, “You have done everything you could to hinder and distort research. You have tried to intimidate people at work to have opposed you. Young people have been experienced, left infertile and suffering.”

In a recent article on X, Rowling seemed to aim for Radcliffe, Watson and Grint on their vocal opposition to his remarks on trans people.

It started with an article that asked: “What actor / actress instantly ruins a film for you?”

Rowling then answered with a cryptic remark, quoting the message and writing“Three assumptions … Sorry, it was irresistible.”

She also added three emojis who laughed at her comment, which has since collected more than 69,000 likes and 22 million views on the social media platform.

The author of the book made no decision to clarify what she meant with the remark, which only made fans combining speculation that she referred to Radcliffe and her co-stars.

For months, Rowling has drawn negative attention to actively share controversial opinions on the Trans community, especially on X.

In an article, she said: “There are no trans children” in response to a person criticizing their remarks on children in the Trans community.

“No child was” born in the wrong body “, wrote the author. “There are only adults like you, ready to sacrifice the health of minors to strengthen your belief in an ideology that will eventually do more harm than lobotomies and combined false memory syndrome.”

More recently, Rowling said that “trans persons had not lost any rights” following the decision of the Supreme Court, while taking a hit in the Trans community in its remarks.

“I have no doubt of some (not all) will be furious that the Supreme Court has confirmed women’s rights,” said Rowling.